![]() Smith's team was asking the court for what prosecutors called a narrow gag order because Trump's comments, they said, threatened to intimidate witnesses and taint the jury pool.Īt Monday's hearing, Lauro vigorously denied any need to place restrictions on the former president's public comments about the case, and said the effort to do so amounted to the Biden administration attempting to silence the president's chief political rival. In a statement, a spokesperson for Trump called the order "an absolute abomination and another partisan knife stuck in the heart of our Democracy by Crooked Joe Biden."Ĭhutkan's decision came after a more than two-hour hearing that at times grew testy, particularly as Trump attorney John Lauro tried to fend off the partial gag order sought by special counsel Jack Smith's office. Trump's attorneys said they planned to appeal the ruling. If Trump or anyone else violates these restrictions, Chutkan said she will consider sanctions "as necessary." Trump's presidential candidacy, Chutkan said, "does not give him carte blanche" to threaten or vilify "public servants simply doing their job." This is about language that presents a danger to the administration of justice," Chutkan said as she announced her decision from the bench. "This is not about whether I like the language Mr. District Judge Tanya Chutkan marked a partial victory for the Justice Department in its bid to impose additional restrictions on Trump's extra-judicial statements in the federal election interference case in Washington. ![]() The federal judge presiding over Donald Trump's election interference case imposed a partial gag order Monday against the former president, barring him and all other parties in the case from making statements targeting prosecutors and court personnel as well as inflammatory statements about likely witnesses. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |